Review




Structured Review

GenScript corporation human mep50
Human Mep50, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human mep50/product/GenScript corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human mep50 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
GenScript corporation human mep50
Human Mep50, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human mep50/product/GenScript corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human mep50 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc human ips cell derived neurons
Human Ips Cell Derived Neurons, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human ips cell derived neurons/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human ips cell derived neurons - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

88
BPS Bioscience g recombinant human prmt5 mep50 enzyme
G Recombinant Human Prmt5 Mep50 Enzyme, supplied by BPS Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/g recombinant human prmt5 mep50 enzyme/product/BPS Bioscience
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
g recombinant human prmt5 mep50 enzyme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Millipore human recombinant prmt5-mep50 complex
a, Overview of the CRISPR interference and knockout approaches. b, qRT-PCR analysis of <t>PRMT5</t> expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). c-d, Western blot analysis of PRMT5 and GAPDH ( c ) and symmetrical arginine dimethylation (SDMA) ( d ) levels in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). Bar charts show quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. e, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 . Here and below, X-axis indicates number of days after transduction. f, qRT-PCR analysis of PRMT5 expression in MOLM-13-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). g, Growth curves of MOLM-13-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 . h , qRT-PCR analysis of PRMT5 expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting <t>WDR77</t> (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). i) Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting WDR77 . j, Competition assays of THP-1-wtCas9, MOLM-13-wtCas9, MONOMAC-6-wtCas9 and mouse Mll-Af9-wtCas9 cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or sgRNAs targeting MCM2 (Mcm2) (positive control) or PRMT5 (Prmt5) . The experiments were repeated at least twice with similar results. The uncropped western blots are presented in the Source Data.
Human Recombinant Prmt5 Mep50 Complex, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human recombinant prmt5-mep50 complex/product/Millipore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human recombinant prmt5-mep50 complex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc 2018 2018 human kinetics
a, Overview of the CRISPR interference and knockout approaches. b, qRT-PCR analysis of <t>PRMT5</t> expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). c-d, Western blot analysis of PRMT5 and GAPDH ( c ) and symmetrical arginine dimethylation (SDMA) ( d ) levels in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). Bar charts show quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. e, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 . Here and below, X-axis indicates number of days after transduction. f, qRT-PCR analysis of PRMT5 expression in MOLM-13-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). g, Growth curves of MOLM-13-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 . h , qRT-PCR analysis of PRMT5 expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting <t>WDR77</t> (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). i) Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting WDR77 . j, Competition assays of THP-1-wtCas9, MOLM-13-wtCas9, MONOMAC-6-wtCas9 and mouse Mll-Af9-wtCas9 cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or sgRNAs targeting MCM2 (Mcm2) (positive control) or PRMT5 (Prmt5) . The experiments were repeated at least twice with similar results. The uncropped western blots are presented in the Source Data.
2018 2018 Human Kinetics, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/2018 2018 human kinetics/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2018 2018 human kinetics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Millipore recombinant human prmt5/mep50
(A) Immunoblot analysis of WM115 cell lysates immunoprecipitated with normal rabbit IgG, <t>anti-PRMT5,</t> or anti-SHARPIN antibodies and blotted for PRMT5 or SHARPIN. (B) Immunoblot analysis of gel filtration fractions from WM793 lysates (3 mg protein). (C) 2D Blue Native–PAGE/SDS-PAGE analysis of WM793 lysates (40 μg/lane). Asterisks indicate SHARPIN and PRMT5 in the complex. (D) Immunoblot analysis of V5-immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or V5-tagged PRMT5 and coexpressing Myc-tagged SHARPIN full-length (FL), NZF-deleted (ΔNZF), UBL deleted (ΔUBL), or Flag-tagged CC–deleted (ΔCC) proteins. (E) Immunoblot analysis of Myc immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or Myc-tagged full-length SHARPIN and coexpressing Flag-tagged full-length PRMT5, N terminus (N-term), middle region (middle), and C terminus (C-term). (F) qPCR analysis (left) of SHARPIN and the PRMT5 target genes ST7, RBL2, or NM23 in WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA. ChIP analysis (right) of arginine-methylated histone H4 at the enhancer/promoter of ST7 or NM23 genes. WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA were immunoprecipitated with an anti-H4R3me2s antibody, and coimmunoprecipitated ST7 or NM23 promoter sequences were quantified by qPCR. (G) Immunoblot analysis of WM793 or WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). (H) In vitro methylation of histone 4 by <t>PRMT5/MEP50</t> after preincubation with buffer or purified full-length or ΔUBL SHARPIN proteins. (I) Blue Native–PAGE gel of lysates from WM793 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). For immunoblot/immunoprecipitation analyses, input indicates 5% of lysate. qPCR data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005; ***P < 0.0005, 2-tailed Student’s t test. (A–I) Data shown represents results of at least 2 independent experiments.
Recombinant Human Prmt5/Mep50, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human prmt5/mep50/product/Millipore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human prmt5/mep50 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

88
BPS Bioscience recombinant human prmt5 mep50 enzyme
(A) Immunoblot analysis of WM115 cell lysates immunoprecipitated with normal rabbit IgG, <t>anti-PRMT5,</t> or anti-SHARPIN antibodies and blotted for PRMT5 or SHARPIN. (B) Immunoblot analysis of gel filtration fractions from WM793 lysates (3 mg protein). (C) 2D Blue Native–PAGE/SDS-PAGE analysis of WM793 lysates (40 μg/lane). Asterisks indicate SHARPIN and PRMT5 in the complex. (D) Immunoblot analysis of V5-immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or V5-tagged PRMT5 and coexpressing Myc-tagged SHARPIN full-length (FL), NZF-deleted (ΔNZF), UBL deleted (ΔUBL), or Flag-tagged CC–deleted (ΔCC) proteins. (E) Immunoblot analysis of Myc immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or Myc-tagged full-length SHARPIN and coexpressing Flag-tagged full-length PRMT5, N terminus (N-term), middle region (middle), and C terminus (C-term). (F) qPCR analysis (left) of SHARPIN and the PRMT5 target genes ST7, RBL2, or NM23 in WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA. ChIP analysis (right) of arginine-methylated histone H4 at the enhancer/promoter of ST7 or NM23 genes. WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA were immunoprecipitated with an anti-H4R3me2s antibody, and coimmunoprecipitated ST7 or NM23 promoter sequences were quantified by qPCR. (G) Immunoblot analysis of WM793 or WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). (H) In vitro methylation of histone 4 by <t>PRMT5/MEP50</t> after preincubation with buffer or purified full-length or ΔUBL SHARPIN proteins. (I) Blue Native–PAGE gel of lysates from WM793 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). For immunoblot/immunoprecipitation analyses, input indicates 5% of lysate. qPCR data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005; ***P < 0.0005, 2-tailed Student’s t test. (A–I) Data shown represents results of at least 2 independent experiments.
Recombinant Human Prmt5 Mep50 Enzyme, supplied by BPS Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human prmt5 mep50 enzyme/product/BPS Bioscience
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human prmt5 mep50 enzyme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene human mep50 cdna
(A) Immunoblot analysis of WM115 cell lysates immunoprecipitated with normal rabbit IgG, <t>anti-PRMT5,</t> or anti-SHARPIN antibodies and blotted for PRMT5 or SHARPIN. (B) Immunoblot analysis of gel filtration fractions from WM793 lysates (3 mg protein). (C) 2D Blue Native–PAGE/SDS-PAGE analysis of WM793 lysates (40 μg/lane). Asterisks indicate SHARPIN and PRMT5 in the complex. (D) Immunoblot analysis of V5-immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or V5-tagged PRMT5 and coexpressing Myc-tagged SHARPIN full-length (FL), NZF-deleted (ΔNZF), UBL deleted (ΔUBL), or Flag-tagged CC–deleted (ΔCC) proteins. (E) Immunoblot analysis of Myc immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or Myc-tagged full-length SHARPIN and coexpressing Flag-tagged full-length PRMT5, N terminus (N-term), middle region (middle), and C terminus (C-term). (F) qPCR analysis (left) of SHARPIN and the PRMT5 target genes ST7, RBL2, or NM23 in WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA. ChIP analysis (right) of arginine-methylated histone H4 at the enhancer/promoter of ST7 or NM23 genes. WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA were immunoprecipitated with an anti-H4R3me2s antibody, and coimmunoprecipitated ST7 or NM23 promoter sequences were quantified by qPCR. (G) Immunoblot analysis of WM793 or WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). (H) In vitro methylation of histone 4 by <t>PRMT5/MEP50</t> after preincubation with buffer or purified full-length or ΔUBL SHARPIN proteins. (I) Blue Native–PAGE gel of lysates from WM793 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). For immunoblot/immunoprecipitation analyses, input indicates 5% of lysate. qPCR data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005; ***P < 0.0005, 2-tailed Student’s t test. (A–I) Data shown represents results of at least 2 independent experiments.
Human Mep50 Cdna, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human mep50 cdna/product/OriGene
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human mep50 cdna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
BPS Bioscience human recombinant flagtagged prmt5 mep50
(A) Immunoblot analysis of WM115 cell lysates immunoprecipitated with normal rabbit IgG, <t>anti-PRMT5,</t> or anti-SHARPIN antibodies and blotted for PRMT5 or SHARPIN. (B) Immunoblot analysis of gel filtration fractions from WM793 lysates (3 mg protein). (C) 2D Blue Native–PAGE/SDS-PAGE analysis of WM793 lysates (40 μg/lane). Asterisks indicate SHARPIN and PRMT5 in the complex. (D) Immunoblot analysis of V5-immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or V5-tagged PRMT5 and coexpressing Myc-tagged SHARPIN full-length (FL), NZF-deleted (ΔNZF), UBL deleted (ΔUBL), or Flag-tagged CC–deleted (ΔCC) proteins. (E) Immunoblot analysis of Myc immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or Myc-tagged full-length SHARPIN and coexpressing Flag-tagged full-length PRMT5, N terminus (N-term), middle region (middle), and C terminus (C-term). (F) qPCR analysis (left) of SHARPIN and the PRMT5 target genes ST7, RBL2, or NM23 in WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA. ChIP analysis (right) of arginine-methylated histone H4 at the enhancer/promoter of ST7 or NM23 genes. WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA were immunoprecipitated with an anti-H4R3me2s antibody, and coimmunoprecipitated ST7 or NM23 promoter sequences were quantified by qPCR. (G) Immunoblot analysis of WM793 or WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). (H) In vitro methylation of histone 4 by <t>PRMT5/MEP50</t> after preincubation with buffer or purified full-length or ΔUBL SHARPIN proteins. (I) Blue Native–PAGE gel of lysates from WM793 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). For immunoblot/immunoprecipitation analyses, input indicates 5% of lysate. qPCR data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005; ***P < 0.0005, 2-tailed Student’s t test. (A–I) Data shown represents results of at least 2 independent experiments.
Human Recombinant Flagtagged Prmt5 Mep50, supplied by BPS Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human recombinant flagtagged prmt5 mep50/product/BPS Bioscience
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human recombinant flagtagged prmt5 mep50 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a, Overview of the CRISPR interference and knockout approaches. b, qRT-PCR analysis of PRMT5 expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). c-d, Western blot analysis of PRMT5 and GAPDH ( c ) and symmetrical arginine dimethylation (SDMA) ( d ) levels in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). Bar charts show quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. e, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 . Here and below, X-axis indicates number of days after transduction. f, qRT-PCR analysis of PRMT5 expression in MOLM-13-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). g, Growth curves of MOLM-13-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 . h , qRT-PCR analysis of PRMT5 expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting WDR77 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). i) Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting WDR77 . j, Competition assays of THP-1-wtCas9, MOLM-13-wtCas9, MONOMAC-6-wtCas9 and mouse Mll-Af9-wtCas9 cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or sgRNAs targeting MCM2 (Mcm2) (positive control) or PRMT5 (Prmt5) . The experiments were repeated at least twice with similar results. The uncropped western blots are presented in the Source Data.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Overview of the CRISPR interference and knockout approaches. b, qRT-PCR analysis of PRMT5 expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). c-d, Western blot analysis of PRMT5 and GAPDH ( c ) and symmetrical arginine dimethylation (SDMA) ( d ) levels in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). Bar charts show quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. e, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 . Here and below, X-axis indicates number of days after transduction. f, qRT-PCR analysis of PRMT5 expression in MOLM-13-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). g, Growth curves of MOLM-13-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting PRMT5 . h , qRT-PCR analysis of PRMT5 expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting WDR77 (3 and 6 days post-transduction). The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3, **** is p-value < 0.0001 using Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). i) Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or two sgRNAs targeting WDR77 . j, Competition assays of THP-1-wtCas9, MOLM-13-wtCas9, MONOMAC-6-wtCas9 and mouse Mll-Af9-wtCas9 cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA or sgRNAs targeting MCM2 (Mcm2) (positive control) or PRMT5 (Prmt5) . The experiments were repeated at least twice with similar results. The uncropped western blots are presented in the Source Data.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: CRISPR, Knock-Out, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Transduction, Western Blot, Positive Control

a, qRT-PCR analysis of total and endogenous PRMT5 expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or wtPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 . The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3 technical replicates, * is p < 0.05, **** is p < 0.0001, “ns” is not significant according to Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). b, Western blot analysis of PRMT5 and B-actin expression and symmetrical arginine dimethylation (SDMA) levels in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or wtPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 six days after transduction. Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. c, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or wtPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 . X-axis indicates number of days after transduction. d, qRT-PCR analysis of total and endogenous PRMT5 expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or cdPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 . The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3 technical replicates, *** is p < 0.001, **** is p < 0.0001 according to Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). e, Western blot analysis of PRMT5 and GAPDH expression and symmetrical arginine dimethylation (SDMA) levels in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or cdPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 three days after transduction. Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. f, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or cdPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 . X-axis indicates number of days after transduction. g, Growth curves of THP-1 cultured in DMSO or with the PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ015666 at different concentrations. X-axis indicates number of days after addition of the compound. The experiments in a-c, g were repeated three times independently with similar results. The experiments in d-f were repeated twice with similar results. Source data for a-g are available online. The uncropped westerns blots for b and e are shown in the Source Data.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, qRT-PCR analysis of total and endogenous PRMT5 expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or wtPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 . The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3 technical replicates, * is p < 0.05, **** is p < 0.0001, “ns” is not significant according to Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). b, Western blot analysis of PRMT5 and B-actin expression and symmetrical arginine dimethylation (SDMA) levels in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or wtPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 six days after transduction. Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. c, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or wtPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 . X-axis indicates number of days after transduction. d, qRT-PCR analysis of total and endogenous PRMT5 expression in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or cdPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 . The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=3 technical replicates, *** is p < 0.001, **** is p < 0.0001 according to Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). e, Western blot analysis of PRMT5 and GAPDH expression and symmetrical arginine dimethylation (SDMA) levels in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or cdPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 three days after transduction. Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. f, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer or cdPRMT5 cells transduced with either a non-targeting (NegCtrl) sgRNA or two sgRNAs against PRMT5 . X-axis indicates number of days after transduction. g, Growth curves of THP-1 cultured in DMSO or with the PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ015666 at different concentrations. X-axis indicates number of days after addition of the compound. The experiments in a-c, g were repeated three times independently with similar results. The experiments in d-f were repeated twice with similar results. Source data for a-g are available online. The uncropped westerns blots for b and e are shown in the Source Data.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Transduction, Western Blot, Cell Culture

a, Western blot analysis of symmetrical arginine dimethylation (SDMA) levels and Vinculin in THP-1 cells treated with DMSO or different doses of PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ015666 at 6 days after the addition of a compound. Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. b, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer cells treated with DMSO or different doses of PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ015666. X-axis indicates number of days after addition of the compound. c, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-wtPRMT5 cells treated with DMSO or different doses of PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ015666. X-axis indicates number of days after addition of the compound. The experiments were repeated twice with similar results. The uncropped western blots are available in the Source Data.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Western blot analysis of symmetrical arginine dimethylation (SDMA) levels and Vinculin in THP-1 cells treated with DMSO or different doses of PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ015666 at 6 days after the addition of a compound. Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. b, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-stuffer cells treated with DMSO or different doses of PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ015666. X-axis indicates number of days after addition of the compound. c, Growth curves of THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB-wtPRMT5 cells treated with DMSO or different doses of PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ015666. X-axis indicates number of days after addition of the compound. The experiments were repeated twice with similar results. The uncropped western blots are available in the Source Data.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Western Blot

a, Outline of the proteome and methylome profiling strategies in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA (NegCtrl) or two independent sgRNAs against PRMT5 (see for details). MMA = monomethylated arginine, SDMA = symmetrically dimethylated arginine, high pH RP = high pH reverse phase chromatography, PSMs = peptide spectrum matches. b, Heatmap of 2962 differentially expressed proteins (q-value ≤ 0.05 in both sgRNAs, limma test, with p-values adjusted by Storey method). c, Boxplot representing relative protein abundance of PRMT5 and its co-factor WDR77 in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with non-targeting sgRNA (NegCtrl) or two independent sgRNAs against PRMT5 . Boxplot summary: outliers (points), minimum (lower whisker), first quartile (lower bound of box), median (horizontal line inside box), third quartile (upper bound of box), interquartile range (box), and maximum (upper whisker). For PRMT5-depleted cells, n=3 independently transduced samples. For wild-type cells, n=4 independently transduced samples. The difference between the negative control and each of the knockdown sgRNA is statistically significant (q-value < 0.05, limma test, with p-values adjusted by Storey method). d, Gene Ontology-based functional classification of 2962 up- and downregulated proteins in THP-1 cells following PRMT5 knockdown (two-sided Fisher’s exact test, FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05). The nodes represent significantly enriched protein sets, node size is proportional to the number of members in a protein set, and color intensity reflects the q-value. Edges indicate the protein overlap between the nodes with thicker edges indicating higher degree of overlap. Orange edges illustrate upregulated categories, green – downregulated. Functionally related protein sets are clustered, numbered and named. Blue color in half circles indicates no enriched categories. e, Venn diagram representing the number of methylated peptides identified using the strategies outlined in Fig.2a. f, An example of normalization of the arginine methylation site quantified against the protein level. 681R and 696R methylation sites of SUPT5H were quantified as decreasing upon PRMT5 knockdown, while the SUPT5H protein itself was, conversely, slightly upregulated. Hence, normalization results in the increased fold change for methylation site quantification. Rme = arginine methylation. Boxplot summary as in c. For PRMT5-depleted cells, n=3 independently transduced samples. For wild-type cells, n=4 independently transduced samples. g, Heatmap of 420 differentially methylated sites. (q-value ≤ 0.1 in both sgRNAs, limma test, with p-values adjusted by Storey method). h, Enrichment map of the Gene Ontology-enriched protein sets across 61 identified potential PRMT5 targets. Representation and statistics as in panel d. The proteomics experiments were performed using three independently transduced samples of PRMT5-depleted cells (two independent sgRNAs) and four independently transduced samples of wild-type cells. Source data are available in .

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Outline of the proteome and methylome profiling strategies in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with a non-targeting sgRNA (NegCtrl) or two independent sgRNAs against PRMT5 (see for details). MMA = monomethylated arginine, SDMA = symmetrically dimethylated arginine, high pH RP = high pH reverse phase chromatography, PSMs = peptide spectrum matches. b, Heatmap of 2962 differentially expressed proteins (q-value ≤ 0.05 in both sgRNAs, limma test, with p-values adjusted by Storey method). c, Boxplot representing relative protein abundance of PRMT5 and its co-factor WDR77 in THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells transduced with non-targeting sgRNA (NegCtrl) or two independent sgRNAs against PRMT5 . Boxplot summary: outliers (points), minimum (lower whisker), first quartile (lower bound of box), median (horizontal line inside box), third quartile (upper bound of box), interquartile range (box), and maximum (upper whisker). For PRMT5-depleted cells, n=3 independently transduced samples. For wild-type cells, n=4 independently transduced samples. The difference between the negative control and each of the knockdown sgRNA is statistically significant (q-value < 0.05, limma test, with p-values adjusted by Storey method). d, Gene Ontology-based functional classification of 2962 up- and downregulated proteins in THP-1 cells following PRMT5 knockdown (two-sided Fisher’s exact test, FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05). The nodes represent significantly enriched protein sets, node size is proportional to the number of members in a protein set, and color intensity reflects the q-value. Edges indicate the protein overlap between the nodes with thicker edges indicating higher degree of overlap. Orange edges illustrate upregulated categories, green – downregulated. Functionally related protein sets are clustered, numbered and named. Blue color in half circles indicates no enriched categories. e, Venn diagram representing the number of methylated peptides identified using the strategies outlined in Fig.2a. f, An example of normalization of the arginine methylation site quantified against the protein level. 681R and 696R methylation sites of SUPT5H were quantified as decreasing upon PRMT5 knockdown, while the SUPT5H protein itself was, conversely, slightly upregulated. Hence, normalization results in the increased fold change for methylation site quantification. Rme = arginine methylation. Boxplot summary as in c. For PRMT5-depleted cells, n=3 independently transduced samples. For wild-type cells, n=4 independently transduced samples. g, Heatmap of 420 differentially methylated sites. (q-value ≤ 0.1 in both sgRNAs, limma test, with p-values adjusted by Storey method). h, Enrichment map of the Gene Ontology-enriched protein sets across 61 identified potential PRMT5 targets. Representation and statistics as in panel d. The proteomics experiments were performed using three independently transduced samples of PRMT5-depleted cells (two independent sgRNAs) and four independently transduced samples of wild-type cells. Source data are available in .

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Transduction, Reversed-phase Chromatography, Whisker Assay, Negative Control, Functional Assay, Methylation

a, 17 out of 62 potential PRMT5 substrates were chosen as potentially essential according to a previously published CRISPRko screen in THP-1 cells. Y axis represents log2FC of the relative abundance of sgRNA in the screen and −1.5 was chosen as a cut-off. b, Distributions of relative abundances of unmethylated and methylated peptide forms after the incubation with or without recombinant PRMT5-WDR77 complex. Only the peptides belonging to the unconfirmed PRMT5 substrates are shown here. c, qRT-PCR analysis of CCT4 , CC7 , PNN , SFPQ , SNRPB , SRSF1 , SUPT5H , TAF15 , CPSF6 and RPS10 expression demonstrates efficient knockdown of the genes upon CRISPRi sgRNA transduction (n=3, * is p-value < 0.033, *** is p-value < 0.001, **** is p-value < 0.0001 according to the unpaired t test). The experiments were repeated twice with similar results.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, 17 out of 62 potential PRMT5 substrates were chosen as potentially essential according to a previously published CRISPRko screen in THP-1 cells. Y axis represents log2FC of the relative abundance of sgRNA in the screen and −1.5 was chosen as a cut-off. b, Distributions of relative abundances of unmethylated and methylated peptide forms after the incubation with or without recombinant PRMT5-WDR77 complex. Only the peptides belonging to the unconfirmed PRMT5 substrates are shown here. c, qRT-PCR analysis of CCT4 , CC7 , PNN , SFPQ , SNRPB , SRSF1 , SUPT5H , TAF15 , CPSF6 and RPS10 expression demonstrates efficient knockdown of the genes upon CRISPRi sgRNA transduction (n=3, * is p-value < 0.033, *** is p-value < 0.001, **** is p-value < 0.0001 according to the unpaired t test). The experiments were repeated twice with similar results.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Methylation, Incubation, Recombinant, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Transduction

a, Distributions of abundances of unmethylated and methylated peptide forms after the incubation with or without recombinant PRMT5-WDR77 complex. Only the peptides belonging to the confirmed PRMT5 substrates are shown here. b, PRMT5 methylation motif predicted using an iceLogo tool. Y axis represents the difference between the frequency of an amino acid in a sample set and the reference set (human proteome). c, CRISPRi competition assays to confirm essentiality of CCT4 , CCT7 , PNN , SNRPB , SRSF1 , TAF15 , SUPT5H , SFPQ , RPS10 and CPSF6 . THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells were transduced with the sgRNAs against the genes of interest and the percentage of sgRNA-transduced (BFP-positive) cells was measured over time. An sgRNA targeting POLR1D was used as a positive control and a non-targeting sgRNA (NegCtrl) was used as a negative control. d, CRISPRko competition assays to confirm essentiality of ALYREF and WDR33 . THP-1-wtCas9 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing the sgRNAs against the genes of interest and the percentage of sgRNA-transduced (BFP-positive) cells was measured over time. An sgRNA targeting MCM2 was used as a positive control and a non-targeting sgRNA (NegCtrl) was used as a negative control. e, Enrichment map of the Gene Ontology-enriched protein sets across 11 validated essential substrates of PRMT5 (two-sided Fisher’s exact test, FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05). Nodes represent significantly enriched protein sets, node size is proportional to the number of members in a protein set, and color intensity depends on the q-value. Edges indicate the protein overlap between the nodes with thicker edges indicating higher overlap between the nodes. Functionally related protein sets are clustered, numbered and named. The experiments in a, c, d were repeated twice with similar results. Source data for a are available in . Source data for c,d are available online.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Distributions of abundances of unmethylated and methylated peptide forms after the incubation with or without recombinant PRMT5-WDR77 complex. Only the peptides belonging to the confirmed PRMT5 substrates are shown here. b, PRMT5 methylation motif predicted using an iceLogo tool. Y axis represents the difference between the frequency of an amino acid in a sample set and the reference set (human proteome). c, CRISPRi competition assays to confirm essentiality of CCT4 , CCT7 , PNN , SNRPB , SRSF1 , TAF15 , SUPT5H , SFPQ , RPS10 and CPSF6 . THP-1-cdCas9-KRAB cells were transduced with the sgRNAs against the genes of interest and the percentage of sgRNA-transduced (BFP-positive) cells was measured over time. An sgRNA targeting POLR1D was used as a positive control and a non-targeting sgRNA (NegCtrl) was used as a negative control. d, CRISPRko competition assays to confirm essentiality of ALYREF and WDR33 . THP-1-wtCas9 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing the sgRNAs against the genes of interest and the percentage of sgRNA-transduced (BFP-positive) cells was measured over time. An sgRNA targeting MCM2 was used as a positive control and a non-targeting sgRNA (NegCtrl) was used as a negative control. e, Enrichment map of the Gene Ontology-enriched protein sets across 11 validated essential substrates of PRMT5 (two-sided Fisher’s exact test, FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05). Nodes represent significantly enriched protein sets, node size is proportional to the number of members in a protein set, and color intensity depends on the q-value. Edges indicate the protein overlap between the nodes with thicker edges indicating higher overlap between the nodes. Functionally related protein sets are clustered, numbered and named. The experiments in a, c, d were repeated twice with similar results. Source data for a are available in . Source data for c,d are available online.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Methylation, Incubation, Recombinant, Transduction, Positive Control, Negative Control, Expressing

A list of the validated essential  PRMT5  substrates.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: A list of the validated essential PRMT5 substrates.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques:

a, Two independent algorithms (DESeq2 and edgeR-limma) identified 2974 RIs in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells. b, In total 2923 of 45450 Cufflinks-assembled transcripts of the THP-1 cells contain DESeq2- or edgeR-limma-detected RIs. Of these, 2668 transcripts are common between the two algorithms. c, Density plot of the transcript abundance demonstrating that the transcripts with RIs (+RIs) are highly expressed in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells comparing to RI-free (–RIs) ones. d, The knockdown of PRMT5 leads to differential usage of a subset of EEJs in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells. The differentially used EEJs were determined using two independent algorithms (limma-diffSplice and JunctionSeq) with moderate overlap between the results. e-g, SRSF1 (e), SRSF2 (f) and SRSF3 (g) motifs are significantly enriched both at the 5’ and 3’ splice sites of the differential EEJs (dynamic thresholding). h, SFPQ motif is not significantly enriched at the 5’ or 3’ splice sites of the differential EEJs (dynamic thresholding). i-j, Density diagrams of SRSF1 motif frequency at the 5’ and 3’ splice sites of the differential and non-differential EEJs in U-87 MG cells. Stars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) (dynamic thresholding). k-l, Median absolute numbers of SRSF1 motifs in differential and non-differential splicing events in U-87 MG cells (fixed thresholding). Boxplot summary ( e-h, k, l ): outliers (diamonds), minimum (lower whisker), first quartile (lower bound of box), median (horizontal line inside box), third quartile (upper bound of box), interquartile range (box), and maximum (upper whisker).

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Two independent algorithms (DESeq2 and edgeR-limma) identified 2974 RIs in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells. b, In total 2923 of 45450 Cufflinks-assembled transcripts of the THP-1 cells contain DESeq2- or edgeR-limma-detected RIs. Of these, 2668 transcripts are common between the two algorithms. c, Density plot of the transcript abundance demonstrating that the transcripts with RIs (+RIs) are highly expressed in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells comparing to RI-free (–RIs) ones. d, The knockdown of PRMT5 leads to differential usage of a subset of EEJs in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells. The differentially used EEJs were determined using two independent algorithms (limma-diffSplice and JunctionSeq) with moderate overlap between the results. e-g, SRSF1 (e), SRSF2 (f) and SRSF3 (g) motifs are significantly enriched both at the 5’ and 3’ splice sites of the differential EEJs (dynamic thresholding). h, SFPQ motif is not significantly enriched at the 5’ or 3’ splice sites of the differential EEJs (dynamic thresholding). i-j, Density diagrams of SRSF1 motif frequency at the 5’ and 3’ splice sites of the differential and non-differential EEJs in U-87 MG cells. Stars indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) (dynamic thresholding). k-l, Median absolute numbers of SRSF1 motifs in differential and non-differential splicing events in U-87 MG cells (fixed thresholding). Boxplot summary ( e-h, k, l ): outliers (diamonds), minimum (lower whisker), first quartile (lower bound of box), median (horizontal line inside box), third quartile (upper bound of box), interquartile range (box), and maximum (upper whisker).

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Whisker Assay

a, DEXSeq and limma-diffSplice algorithms show the differential usage of 415 RIs in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells following PRMT5 knockdown (more than 2-fold changes, p-value < 0.002, q-value < 0.05). b, Volcano plot demonstrating the differential usage of retained introns in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells upon PRMT5 knockdown (total 109530 events). RIs were included in differential analysis as expressed exons, and 336 diffRIs are shown using dark orange squares. The vertical dashed lines represent two-fold differences between the PRMT5 knockdown and wild type cells and horizontal dashed line shows the FDR adjusted q-value threshold of 0.05. These results were generated using DEXSeq algorithm, and very similar results were observed with limma-diffSplice approach. c, Volcano plot demonstrating the differential usage of EEJs in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells upon PRMT5 knockdown (total 76434 exon-exon junctions). 430 DiffEEJs are shown by dark orange squares. The vertical dashed lines represent two-fold differences between the PRMT5 knockdown and wild type cells, and horizontal dashed line shows the FDR adjusted q-value threshold of 0.05. These results were generated using limma-diffSplice algorithm. d, The majority of the identified non-diffEEJs or diffEEJs are annotated in the Ensembl database (GRCh38.p7 assembly of human genome, release 85, July 2016), and only small fractions of EEJs are new junctions. The following numbers of EEJs were analyzed: non-diffEEJs – 76004, diffEEJs log 2 FC < −1 – 184, diffEEJs log 2 FC > 1 – 246). e, Classification of non-diffEEJs and diffEEJs according to main modes, or types, of alternative splicing. The identified EEJs were divided in three sub-sets: i) non-diffEEJs, ii) diffEEJs with prevalence in the control cells (logFC < –1), and iii) diffEEJs with prevalence in the cells with PRMT5 knockdown (logFC > 1). Classification was carried out using Ensembl-based models of hypothetical non-alternative preRNAs of human genes. Numbers show the percentage of EEJs assigned to a particular mode of alternative splicing. f, Venn diagram demonstrating minimal overlap between the lists of differentially expressed genes (genes diffExpr), genes with diffRIs (genes diffRIs) and genes with diffEEJs (genes diffEEJs). g, Density diagrams of SRSF1 motif frequency at the 5’ and 3’ splice sites of the differential and non-differential EEJs (dynamic thresholding). h-i, Median absolute numbers of SRSF1 motifs in differential and non-differential EEJs ( h ) and RIs ( i ) (fixed thresholding, two-sided Mann-Whitney U test). Boxplot summary ( h,i ): outliers (diamonds), minimum (lower whisker), first quartile (lower bound of box), median (horizontal line inside box), third quartile (upper bound of box), interquartile range (box), and maximum (upper whisker). The following numbers of splicing events were compared: non-diffEEJs – 76004, difEEJs downregulated – 184, diffEEJs upregulated – 246, non-diffRIs – 1540, diffRIs – 336. j, Density diagrams of SFPQ motif frequency at the 5’ and 3’ splice sites of the differential and non-differential EEJs (dynamic thresholding). k-l, Venn diagrams of the overlapping lists of the differentially used EEJs ( k ) and RIs ( l ) identified in THP-1 and U-87 MG cells upon PRMT5 KD. The splicing analysis experiments were performed using three independently transduced samples of each sgRNA. Source data are available in .

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, DEXSeq and limma-diffSplice algorithms show the differential usage of 415 RIs in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells following PRMT5 knockdown (more than 2-fold changes, p-value < 0.002, q-value < 0.05). b, Volcano plot demonstrating the differential usage of retained introns in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells upon PRMT5 knockdown (total 109530 events). RIs were included in differential analysis as expressed exons, and 336 diffRIs are shown using dark orange squares. The vertical dashed lines represent two-fold differences between the PRMT5 knockdown and wild type cells and horizontal dashed line shows the FDR adjusted q-value threshold of 0.05. These results were generated using DEXSeq algorithm, and very similar results were observed with limma-diffSplice approach. c, Volcano plot demonstrating the differential usage of EEJs in the transcriptome of THP-1 cells upon PRMT5 knockdown (total 76434 exon-exon junctions). 430 DiffEEJs are shown by dark orange squares. The vertical dashed lines represent two-fold differences between the PRMT5 knockdown and wild type cells, and horizontal dashed line shows the FDR adjusted q-value threshold of 0.05. These results were generated using limma-diffSplice algorithm. d, The majority of the identified non-diffEEJs or diffEEJs are annotated in the Ensembl database (GRCh38.p7 assembly of human genome, release 85, July 2016), and only small fractions of EEJs are new junctions. The following numbers of EEJs were analyzed: non-diffEEJs – 76004, diffEEJs log 2 FC < −1 – 184, diffEEJs log 2 FC > 1 – 246). e, Classification of non-diffEEJs and diffEEJs according to main modes, or types, of alternative splicing. The identified EEJs were divided in three sub-sets: i) non-diffEEJs, ii) diffEEJs with prevalence in the control cells (logFC < –1), and iii) diffEEJs with prevalence in the cells with PRMT5 knockdown (logFC > 1). Classification was carried out using Ensembl-based models of hypothetical non-alternative preRNAs of human genes. Numbers show the percentage of EEJs assigned to a particular mode of alternative splicing. f, Venn diagram demonstrating minimal overlap between the lists of differentially expressed genes (genes diffExpr), genes with diffRIs (genes diffRIs) and genes with diffEEJs (genes diffEEJs). g, Density diagrams of SRSF1 motif frequency at the 5’ and 3’ splice sites of the differential and non-differential EEJs (dynamic thresholding). h-i, Median absolute numbers of SRSF1 motifs in differential and non-differential EEJs ( h ) and RIs ( i ) (fixed thresholding, two-sided Mann-Whitney U test). Boxplot summary ( h,i ): outliers (diamonds), minimum (lower whisker), first quartile (lower bound of box), median (horizontal line inside box), third quartile (upper bound of box), interquartile range (box), and maximum (upper whisker). The following numbers of splicing events were compared: non-diffEEJs – 76004, difEEJs downregulated – 184, diffEEJs upregulated – 246, non-diffRIs – 1540, diffRIs – 336. j, Density diagrams of SFPQ motif frequency at the 5’ and 3’ splice sites of the differential and non-differential EEJs (dynamic thresholding). k-l, Venn diagrams of the overlapping lists of the differentially used EEJs ( k ) and RIs ( l ) identified in THP-1 and U-87 MG cells upon PRMT5 KD. The splicing analysis experiments were performed using three independently transduced samples of each sgRNA. Source data are available in .

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Generated, MANN-WHITNEY, Whisker Assay

a, Venn diagram showing that among the 826 differentially spliced genes in the PRMT5 KD cells, 88 also exhibited change in their total protein levels, of which 74 proteins were downregulated and 14 proteins upregulated. b, Competition assays of THP-1-wtCas9 cells transduced with the sgRNAs targeting the genes of interest. The percentage of sgRNA-transduced (BFP-positive) cells was measured over time. An sgRNA against MCM2 was used as a positive control and a non-targeting sgRNA (NegCtrl) was used as a negative control. c, Barplot representing changes in protein abundance of the selected candidates upon the knockdown of PRMT5 . The values are mean±SD. For PRMT5-depleted cells, n=3 independently transduced samples. For wild-type cells, n=4 independently transduced samples. The values are shown relative to NegCtrl sgRNA (q-value < 0.05, limma test, with p-values adjusted by Storey method). d, qRT-PCR validation of the identified differential retained intron events. The values represent mean±SD of two independent transductions. * is p-value < 0.1, “ns” is not significant according to an unpaired t test. e, qRT-PCR validation of the identified differential EEJ. The values represent mean±SD of two independent transductions. The differential EEJ of the GRIPAP1 gene was added as an example of an exon skipping event, which is a predominant mode of the upregulated alternative splicing events in the PRMT5 KD cells. * is p-value < 0.1, “ns” is not significant according to an unpaired t test. f, Scatter plot demonstrating the correlation between the log FC of the differential splicing events obtained using RNA-seq (n=3 independent transductions) and qPCR approaches (n=2 independent transductions) (two-sided Student t-test). g-h, Schematic representation of the differential alternative splicing events in PDCD2 (g) and PNKP (h) RNA transcripts. In (g), EEJs are designated by the letter J and numbered. The concomitant statistics for these junctions are as follows: J2 (log2 FC = 0.22, q = 0.846), J3 (log2 FC = 1.23; q = 2.53E-02), J4 (log2 FC = −0.76; q = 0.034) and J5 (log2 FC = −0.31; q = 0.708). The differential splicing events are highlighted in purple. i, qRT-PCR analysis of the levels of PRMT5 , constitutive PNKP EEJ ( PNKP cEEJ) and PNKP retained intron ( PNKP RI) in the cells transduced either with a negative control or a sgRNA targeting PRMT5 and treated with emetine or water for 3 hours. “ PNKP RI norm” stands for the expression of the PNKP RI normalized to the levels of PNKP cEEJ. The values are mean ± SD (n=3 technical replicates, * is p-value < 0.01, ** is p-value < 0.005, *** is p-value < 0.001, **** is p-value < 0.0001, “ns” is not significant according to Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). The experiment in b was repeated three times independently with similar results. The experiments in d, e were performed in two independent viral transductions. The experiment in i was performed in three independent viral transductions, which where pooled prior to qRT-PCR analysis. Source data for b, d-f, i are available online. Source data for c, f are available in and , respectively.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Venn diagram showing that among the 826 differentially spliced genes in the PRMT5 KD cells, 88 also exhibited change in their total protein levels, of which 74 proteins were downregulated and 14 proteins upregulated. b, Competition assays of THP-1-wtCas9 cells transduced with the sgRNAs targeting the genes of interest. The percentage of sgRNA-transduced (BFP-positive) cells was measured over time. An sgRNA against MCM2 was used as a positive control and a non-targeting sgRNA (NegCtrl) was used as a negative control. c, Barplot representing changes in protein abundance of the selected candidates upon the knockdown of PRMT5 . The values are mean±SD. For PRMT5-depleted cells, n=3 independently transduced samples. For wild-type cells, n=4 independently transduced samples. The values are shown relative to NegCtrl sgRNA (q-value < 0.05, limma test, with p-values adjusted by Storey method). d, qRT-PCR validation of the identified differential retained intron events. The values represent mean±SD of two independent transductions. * is p-value < 0.1, “ns” is not significant according to an unpaired t test. e, qRT-PCR validation of the identified differential EEJ. The values represent mean±SD of two independent transductions. The differential EEJ of the GRIPAP1 gene was added as an example of an exon skipping event, which is a predominant mode of the upregulated alternative splicing events in the PRMT5 KD cells. * is p-value < 0.1, “ns” is not significant according to an unpaired t test. f, Scatter plot demonstrating the correlation between the log FC of the differential splicing events obtained using RNA-seq (n=3 independent transductions) and qPCR approaches (n=2 independent transductions) (two-sided Student t-test). g-h, Schematic representation of the differential alternative splicing events in PDCD2 (g) and PNKP (h) RNA transcripts. In (g), EEJs are designated by the letter J and numbered. The concomitant statistics for these junctions are as follows: J2 (log2 FC = 0.22, q = 0.846), J3 (log2 FC = 1.23; q = 2.53E-02), J4 (log2 FC = −0.76; q = 0.034) and J5 (log2 FC = −0.31; q = 0.708). The differential splicing events are highlighted in purple. i, qRT-PCR analysis of the levels of PRMT5 , constitutive PNKP EEJ ( PNKP cEEJ) and PNKP retained intron ( PNKP RI) in the cells transduced either with a negative control or a sgRNA targeting PRMT5 and treated with emetine or water for 3 hours. “ PNKP RI norm” stands for the expression of the PNKP RI normalized to the levels of PNKP cEEJ. The values are mean ± SD (n=3 technical replicates, * is p-value < 0.01, ** is p-value < 0.005, *** is p-value < 0.001, **** is p-value < 0.0001, “ns” is not significant according to Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). The experiment in b was repeated three times independently with similar results. The experiments in d, e were performed in two independent viral transductions. The experiment in i was performed in three independent viral transductions, which where pooled prior to qRT-PCR analysis. Source data for b, d-f, i are available online. Source data for c, f are available in and , respectively.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Transduction, Positive Control, Negative Control, Quantitative RT-PCR, RNA Sequencing Assay, Expressing

a, Median absolute numbers of SRSF1 motifs near all the splicing sites that do not change upon PRMT5 depletion and near the splicing sites that change upon PRMT5 KD in the selected essential candidate genes ( FDPS , PDCD2 , PNISR , PNKP , POLD1 , POLD2 , PPP1R7 ) (fixed thresholding). Boxplot summary: outliers (diamonds), minimum (lower whisker), first quartile (lower bound of box), median (horizontal line inside box), third quartile (upper bound of box), interquartile range (box), and maximum (upper whisker). b, Table summary of the identified SRSF1 binding sites in all the splicing events that change upon PRMT5 KD in the FDPS , PDCD2 , PNISR , PNKP , POLD1 , POLD2 , PPP1R7 genes.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Median absolute numbers of SRSF1 motifs near all the splicing sites that do not change upon PRMT5 depletion and near the splicing sites that change upon PRMT5 KD in the selected essential candidate genes ( FDPS , PDCD2 , PNISR , PNKP , POLD1 , POLD2 , PPP1R7 ) (fixed thresholding). Boxplot summary: outliers (diamonds), minimum (lower whisker), first quartile (lower bound of box), median (horizontal line inside box), third quartile (upper bound of box), interquartile range (box), and maximum (upper whisker). b, Table summary of the identified SRSF1 binding sites in all the splicing events that change upon PRMT5 KD in the FDPS , PDCD2 , PNISR , PNKP , POLD1 , POLD2 , PPP1R7 genes.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Whisker Assay, Binding Assay

a, Competition assays to assess the functionality of the R-to-K mutants of the essential PRMT5 substrates. Cell lines stably expressing either the wild type or mutant versions of each substrate were transduced with an sgRNA against the substrate of interest. After the transduction, the percentage of BFP positive (sgRNA-expressing) cells was monitored over time. b, qRT-PCR analysis of the endogenous (3’UTR) and exogenous SRSF1 expression in BFP and mCherry double positive cells co-transduced with an sgRNA targeting SRSF1 and either SRSF1 WT or mutant cDNA or a stuffer construct. The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=2 technical replicates, ** is p-value < 0.01, *** is p-value < 0.001, **** is p-value < 0.0001, “ns” is non-significant according to Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). The experiments in a and b were repeated twice with similar results. The source data are available online.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Competition assays to assess the functionality of the R-to-K mutants of the essential PRMT5 substrates. Cell lines stably expressing either the wild type or mutant versions of each substrate were transduced with an sgRNA against the substrate of interest. After the transduction, the percentage of BFP positive (sgRNA-expressing) cells was monitored over time. b, qRT-PCR analysis of the endogenous (3’UTR) and exogenous SRSF1 expression in BFP and mCherry double positive cells co-transduced with an sgRNA targeting SRSF1 and either SRSF1 WT or mutant cDNA or a stuffer construct. The values are normalized to RPLP0 and shown as mean ±SD (n=2 technical replicates, ** is p-value < 0.01, *** is p-value < 0.001, **** is p-value < 0.0001, “ns” is non-significant according to Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). The experiments in a and b were repeated twice with similar results. The source data are available online.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Stable Transfection, Expressing, Mutagenesis, Transduction, Quantitative RT-PCR, Construct

a, Western blot validation of SRSF1 antibody. Significant decrease in the signal observed after the SRSF1 knockdown, demonstrating antibody specificity. Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. b, Western blotting for SRSF1, Lamin B1 and GAPDH after cell transduction with either a negative control or a PRMT5 sgRNA and subsequent nuclear-cytoplasm fractionation. Lamin B1 and GAPDH were used as controls for successful fractionation into nuclear and cytoplasmic (cyto) fractions, respectively. Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels. c, Representative immunofluorescence images of HeLa cells transiently transfected with either triple-FLAG-tagged wild type, triple R-to-K or triple R-to-A mutant SRSF1 cDNAs driven by the CAG promoter. Scale bar = 10 μm. d, Representative immunofluorescence images of HeLa cells transiently transfected with either triple-FLAG-tagged wild type, triple R-to-K or triple R-to-A mutant SRSF1 cDNAs driven by the EF1a promoter. Scale bar = 10 μm. The experiments in the figure were repeated at least twice with similar results. The uncropped western blots are available in the Source Data.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Western blot validation of SRSF1 antibody. Significant decrease in the signal observed after the SRSF1 knockdown, demonstrating antibody specificity. Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels relative to a loading control. b, Western blotting for SRSF1, Lamin B1 and GAPDH after cell transduction with either a negative control or a PRMT5 sgRNA and subsequent nuclear-cytoplasm fractionation. Lamin B1 and GAPDH were used as controls for successful fractionation into nuclear and cytoplasmic (cyto) fractions, respectively. Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels. c, Representative immunofluorescence images of HeLa cells transiently transfected with either triple-FLAG-tagged wild type, triple R-to-K or triple R-to-A mutant SRSF1 cDNAs driven by the CAG promoter. Scale bar = 10 μm. d, Representative immunofluorescence images of HeLa cells transiently transfected with either triple-FLAG-tagged wild type, triple R-to-K or triple R-to-A mutant SRSF1 cDNAs driven by the EF1a promoter. Scale bar = 10 μm. The experiments in the figure were repeated at least twice with similar results. The uncropped western blots are available in the Source Data.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Western Blot, Transduction, Negative Control, Fractionation, Immunofluorescence, Transfection, Mutagenesis

a, Western blotting for SRSF1 and PRMT5 in the input and immunoprecipitation samples (either SRSF1 or IgG). Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels. b, RNA yield after RNA-immunoprecipitation and purification in three biological replicates of each sample. c, Heatmap of the methylated peptides identified for SRSF1 in the negative control and PRMT5 KD SRSF1 IP-MS samples. “aa” stands for amino acid. Each IP was performed in three biological replicates. The uncropped western blots are available in the Source Data.

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Western blotting for SRSF1 and PRMT5 in the input and immunoprecipitation samples (either SRSF1 or IgG). Bar chart shows quantification of protein levels. b, RNA yield after RNA-immunoprecipitation and purification in three biological replicates of each sample. c, Heatmap of the methylated peptides identified for SRSF1 in the negative control and PRMT5 KD SRSF1 IP-MS samples. “aa” stands for amino acid. Each IP was performed in three biological replicates. The uncropped western blots are available in the Source Data.

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Purification, Methylation, Negative Control

a, Differential binding of SRSF1 to mRNAs upon PRMT5 KD (differentially bound mRNAs are represented by orange color, q-value < 0.05). mRNAs of 13754 genes were identified of which 4459 were differentially bound. b, Overlap of differentially spliced genes with the genes, which mRNAs are differentially bound by SRSF1 upon PRMT5 KD. c, Distribution of differentially spliced genes among the genes with differentially or non-differentially bound mRNAs. d, Differential binding of SRSF1 to proteins upon PRMT5 KD. Dashed lines indicate the chosen thresholds of 2-fold change and q-value of 0.05. Total of 350 binding partners were quantified, and 162 significantly differentially bound proteins are indicated with triangles. The most enriched functional groups of proteins among the differential interactors are indicated with color. e, Proposed model for the essential function of PRMT5. PRMT5 methylates SRSF1 at three arginine sites, which are important for the function of SRSF1 in splicing regulation. Loss of SRSF1 methylation leads to altered binding of SRSF1 to mRNA and proteins, differential alternative splicing of multiple essential genes and, consequently, cell death. RIP-sequencing and SRSF1 IP-MS experiments were performed using 3 independently transduced samples of each sgRNA. The source data for the figure is available in and .

Journal: Nature structural & molecular biology

Article Title: PRMT5 methylome profiling uncovers a direct link to splicing regulation in acute myeloid leukemia

doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0313-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Differential binding of SRSF1 to mRNAs upon PRMT5 KD (differentially bound mRNAs are represented by orange color, q-value < 0.05). mRNAs of 13754 genes were identified of which 4459 were differentially bound. b, Overlap of differentially spliced genes with the genes, which mRNAs are differentially bound by SRSF1 upon PRMT5 KD. c, Distribution of differentially spliced genes among the genes with differentially or non-differentially bound mRNAs. d, Differential binding of SRSF1 to proteins upon PRMT5 KD. Dashed lines indicate the chosen thresholds of 2-fold change and q-value of 0.05. Total of 350 binding partners were quantified, and 162 significantly differentially bound proteins are indicated with triangles. The most enriched functional groups of proteins among the differential interactors are indicated with color. e, Proposed model for the essential function of PRMT5. PRMT5 methylates SRSF1 at three arginine sites, which are important for the function of SRSF1 in splicing regulation. Loss of SRSF1 methylation leads to altered binding of SRSF1 to mRNA and proteins, differential alternative splicing of multiple essential genes and, consequently, cell death. RIP-sequencing and SRSF1 IP-MS experiments were performed using 3 independently transduced samples of each sgRNA. The source data for the figure is available in and .

Article Snippet: Each reaction was performed in 25 μL for 12 hours at 37°C with 300 ng of the corresponding peptide and 0.2 μL of active human recombinant PRMT5-MEP50 complex (Sigma, SRP0145) or water (negative control).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Functional Assay, Methylation, Sequencing

(A) Immunoblot analysis of WM115 cell lysates immunoprecipitated with normal rabbit IgG, anti-PRMT5, or anti-SHARPIN antibodies and blotted for PRMT5 or SHARPIN. (B) Immunoblot analysis of gel filtration fractions from WM793 lysates (3 mg protein). (C) 2D Blue Native–PAGE/SDS-PAGE analysis of WM793 lysates (40 μg/lane). Asterisks indicate SHARPIN and PRMT5 in the complex. (D) Immunoblot analysis of V5-immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or V5-tagged PRMT5 and coexpressing Myc-tagged SHARPIN full-length (FL), NZF-deleted (ΔNZF), UBL deleted (ΔUBL), or Flag-tagged CC–deleted (ΔCC) proteins. (E) Immunoblot analysis of Myc immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or Myc-tagged full-length SHARPIN and coexpressing Flag-tagged full-length PRMT5, N terminus (N-term), middle region (middle), and C terminus (C-term). (F) qPCR analysis (left) of SHARPIN and the PRMT5 target genes ST7, RBL2, or NM23 in WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA. ChIP analysis (right) of arginine-methylated histone H4 at the enhancer/promoter of ST7 or NM23 genes. WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA were immunoprecipitated with an anti-H4R3me2s antibody, and coimmunoprecipitated ST7 or NM23 promoter sequences were quantified by qPCR. (G) Immunoblot analysis of WM793 or WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). (H) In vitro methylation of histone 4 by PRMT5/MEP50 after preincubation with buffer or purified full-length or ΔUBL SHARPIN proteins. (I) Blue Native–PAGE gel of lysates from WM793 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). For immunoblot/immunoprecipitation analyses, input indicates 5% of lysate. qPCR data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005; ***P < 0.0005, 2-tailed Student’s t test. (A–I) Data shown represents results of at least 2 independent experiments.

Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: SHARPIN-mediated regulation of protein arginine methyltransferase 5 controls melanoma growth

doi: 10.1172/JCI95410

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Immunoblot analysis of WM115 cell lysates immunoprecipitated with normal rabbit IgG, anti-PRMT5, or anti-SHARPIN antibodies and blotted for PRMT5 or SHARPIN. (B) Immunoblot analysis of gel filtration fractions from WM793 lysates (3 mg protein). (C) 2D Blue Native–PAGE/SDS-PAGE analysis of WM793 lysates (40 μg/lane). Asterisks indicate SHARPIN and PRMT5 in the complex. (D) Immunoblot analysis of V5-immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or V5-tagged PRMT5 and coexpressing Myc-tagged SHARPIN full-length (FL), NZF-deleted (ΔNZF), UBL deleted (ΔUBL), or Flag-tagged CC–deleted (ΔCC) proteins. (E) Immunoblot analysis of Myc immunoprecipitates from HEK293T cells expressing empty vector or Myc-tagged full-length SHARPIN and coexpressing Flag-tagged full-length PRMT5, N terminus (N-term), middle region (middle), and C terminus (C-term). (F) qPCR analysis (left) of SHARPIN and the PRMT5 target genes ST7, RBL2, or NM23 in WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA. ChIP analysis (right) of arginine-methylated histone H4 at the enhancer/promoter of ST7 or NM23 genes. WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNA were immunoprecipitated with an anti-H4R3me2s antibody, and coimmunoprecipitated ST7 or NM23 promoter sequences were quantified by qPCR. (G) Immunoblot analysis of WM793 or WM35 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). (H) In vitro methylation of histone 4 by PRMT5/MEP50 after preincubation with buffer or purified full-length or ΔUBL SHARPIN proteins. (I) Blue Native–PAGE gel of lysates from WM793 cells expressing scrambled or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs (nos. 1 and 3). For immunoblot/immunoprecipitation analyses, input indicates 5% of lysate. qPCR data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005; ***P < 0.0005, 2-tailed Student’s t test. (A–I) Data shown represents results of at least 2 independent experiments.

Article Snippet: Recombinant human TGF-β was purchased from R&D Systems, and recombinant human PRMT5/MEP50 was from Sigma-Aldrich.

Techniques: Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Filtration, Blue Native PAGE, SDS Page, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, shRNA, Methylation, In Vitro, Purification

(A) Luciferase reporter assay of TGF-β signaling in WM793 cells expressing scrambled shRNA or HOIP-, HOIL-1L–, or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs. Cells transfected with TGF-β reporter (CAGAx9-luc) and pCMV-Cypridina-luc (internal control) reporter plasmids were treated with TGF-β (20 ng/ml) for 8 or 24 hours. (B) qPCR analysis of SOX10, PAX3, and MITF expression in WM115 cells expressing empty vector (control), SHARPIN, or PRMT5 expression plasmids and treated with TGF-β (20 ng/ml) for 0, 24, or 48 hours. (C) Immunoblot and qPCR analysis of WM115 cells transfected with scrambled (control) siRNA or SKI-specific SMARTpool siRNA. (D) ChIP analysis of WM115 cells expressing empty vector, SHARPIN, or PRMT5 and treated with vehicle (Veh) or TGF-β (20 ng/ml) for 18 hours. ChIP analysis was performed with anti-SKI antibody, and coimmunoprecipitated SOX10 or PAX3 promoter sequences were quantified by qPCR. (E) Immunoblot analysis of SKI and p53 in WM115 cell lysates immunoprecipitated with normal rabbit serum (NRS) or SYM10 antibody. (F) Analysis as in E except WM115 cells expressed scrambled or PRMT5-specific shRNA. (G) Immunoblot analysis of anti-Flag immunoprecipitates of A375 cells coexpressing WT, Arg8 mutated (R8K), or Arg658/660 mutated (RR/KK) SKI with either PRMT5 or SHARPIN. Asterisks and arrowhead indicate SHARPIN and tubulin, respectively. (H) Immunoblot analysis of anti-Myc immunoprecipitates of HEK293T cells expressing Myc-tagged SHARPIN and Flag-tagged WT, R8K mutant, or RR/KK mutant SKI proteins. (I) Immunoblot analysis of IgG or anti-SKI immunoprecipitates of SK-Mel-28 cells. (J) ChIP analysis as in D of WM115 cells expressing WT or R8K mutant SKI proteins. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with indicated antibodies. For immunoprecipitation analyses, input indicates 5% of lysates. Statistical significance was calculated using 2-way ANOVA (Dunnett’s test, A and B) or 2-tailed Student’s t test (C, D, J). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005; ***P < 0.0005.

Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: SHARPIN-mediated regulation of protein arginine methyltransferase 5 controls melanoma growth

doi: 10.1172/JCI95410

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Luciferase reporter assay of TGF-β signaling in WM793 cells expressing scrambled shRNA or HOIP-, HOIL-1L–, or SHARPIN-specific shRNAs. Cells transfected with TGF-β reporter (CAGAx9-luc) and pCMV-Cypridina-luc (internal control) reporter plasmids were treated with TGF-β (20 ng/ml) for 8 or 24 hours. (B) qPCR analysis of SOX10, PAX3, and MITF expression in WM115 cells expressing empty vector (control), SHARPIN, or PRMT5 expression plasmids and treated with TGF-β (20 ng/ml) for 0, 24, or 48 hours. (C) Immunoblot and qPCR analysis of WM115 cells transfected with scrambled (control) siRNA or SKI-specific SMARTpool siRNA. (D) ChIP analysis of WM115 cells expressing empty vector, SHARPIN, or PRMT5 and treated with vehicle (Veh) or TGF-β (20 ng/ml) for 18 hours. ChIP analysis was performed with anti-SKI antibody, and coimmunoprecipitated SOX10 or PAX3 promoter sequences were quantified by qPCR. (E) Immunoblot analysis of SKI and p53 in WM115 cell lysates immunoprecipitated with normal rabbit serum (NRS) or SYM10 antibody. (F) Analysis as in E except WM115 cells expressed scrambled or PRMT5-specific shRNA. (G) Immunoblot analysis of anti-Flag immunoprecipitates of A375 cells coexpressing WT, Arg8 mutated (R8K), or Arg658/660 mutated (RR/KK) SKI with either PRMT5 or SHARPIN. Asterisks and arrowhead indicate SHARPIN and tubulin, respectively. (H) Immunoblot analysis of anti-Myc immunoprecipitates of HEK293T cells expressing Myc-tagged SHARPIN and Flag-tagged WT, R8K mutant, or RR/KK mutant SKI proteins. (I) Immunoblot analysis of IgG or anti-SKI immunoprecipitates of SK-Mel-28 cells. (J) ChIP analysis as in D of WM115 cells expressing WT or R8K mutant SKI proteins. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with indicated antibodies. For immunoprecipitation analyses, input indicates 5% of lysates. Statistical significance was calculated using 2-way ANOVA (Dunnett’s test, A and B) or 2-tailed Student’s t test (C, D, J). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005; ***P < 0.0005.

Article Snippet: Recombinant human TGF-β was purchased from R&D Systems, and recombinant human PRMT5/MEP50 was from Sigma-Aldrich.

Techniques: Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Expressing, shRNA, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Mutagenesis

(A) Expression of MTAP and CDKN2A genes in melanoma patients (TCGA, n = 472). Green and red vertical lines indicate the cutoffs for classification as low-MTAP (n = 70) and high-MTAP (n = 50) melanomas, respectively. The green horizontal line indicates the expression level in normal tissue (TCGA, n = 1). (B) Pearson’s correlation coefficients for SHARPIN and SOX10 or SHARPIN and PAX3 expression in all (n = 472, blue), MTAP-low (n = 70, green), and MTAP-high (n = 50, red) melanoma samples. (C) Immunoblot analysis of the indicated proteins in melanoma cells with high, medium, or low sensitivity to growth inhibition by SHARPIN KD. (D) Immunoblot analysis (left upper) and colony-forming efficiency (lower) assay of WM35 cells expressing empty vector (control) or overexpressing SHARPIN. Cells were treated with vehicle (DMSO) or MTA (100 μM) for 72 hours. For CFE, cells were seeded at 103/well and colonies were visualized and quantified (lower right) after 14 days in culture. PRMT5 activity (upper right) was assessed in anti-PRMT5–immunoprecipitated cell lysates. The quantitation data are presented as mean ± SD. n = 3 (lower right). n = 6 (upper right). Statistical significance was calculated using 2-way ANOVA (Tukey’s test). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.0005. (C and D) Data shown represent at least 2 independent experiments.

Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: SHARPIN-mediated regulation of protein arginine methyltransferase 5 controls melanoma growth

doi: 10.1172/JCI95410

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Expression of MTAP and CDKN2A genes in melanoma patients (TCGA, n = 472). Green and red vertical lines indicate the cutoffs for classification as low-MTAP (n = 70) and high-MTAP (n = 50) melanomas, respectively. The green horizontal line indicates the expression level in normal tissue (TCGA, n = 1). (B) Pearson’s correlation coefficients for SHARPIN and SOX10 or SHARPIN and PAX3 expression in all (n = 472, blue), MTAP-low (n = 70, green), and MTAP-high (n = 50, red) melanoma samples. (C) Immunoblot analysis of the indicated proteins in melanoma cells with high, medium, or low sensitivity to growth inhibition by SHARPIN KD. (D) Immunoblot analysis (left upper) and colony-forming efficiency (lower) assay of WM35 cells expressing empty vector (control) or overexpressing SHARPIN. Cells were treated with vehicle (DMSO) or MTA (100 μM) for 72 hours. For CFE, cells were seeded at 103/well and colonies were visualized and quantified (lower right) after 14 days in culture. PRMT5 activity (upper right) was assessed in anti-PRMT5–immunoprecipitated cell lysates. The quantitation data are presented as mean ± SD. n = 3 (lower right). n = 6 (upper right). Statistical significance was calculated using 2-way ANOVA (Tukey’s test). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.0005. (C and D) Data shown represent at least 2 independent experiments.

Article Snippet: Recombinant human TGF-β was purchased from R&D Systems, and recombinant human PRMT5/MEP50 was from Sigma-Aldrich.

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Inhibition, Plasmid Preparation, Activity Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Quantitation Assay